Its funny but, why would a “diverse” school environment prepare White and Asian kids for an allegedly “diverse” United States when those very same kids will move heaven and earth to not share the same space with Hispanics and Blacks?
Why U.S. News and World Report Should Include A Diversity Index in its Ranking of Law Schools:
‘Tis the season to be, if not jolly about, at least aware of, one of the most prominent law school rankings systems; the U.S. News and World Report’s annual law school survey will issue in about a month. There are many law school rating schemes out there, and people who care about evaluating law schools would do well to consult a variety of them before forming impressions. But there is no denying that the U.S. News ranking system is currently the most visible. And for that reason it is – for better or worse – the one that influences the behavior of law schools the most.
In this column, we begin to analyze one way in which the U.S. News rankings can negatively affect schools and the legal profession – by deterring schools from taking steps to diversify their student bodies – and possible responses to the problem. …
Diversity is relevant to what U.S. News is trying to gauge, but not because a diverse school is doing a good job in redressing past injustice in its state. Diversity is relevant because – as the Supreme Court has recognized and proclaimed in recent years – a diverse school provides a richer learning environment for its students, who will then be better prepared, going forward, to enter and succeed in the realm of diversity that is the entire United States and the world.
There’s so much crazy in this article its hard to know where to start, but we’ll give it the old “diverse” college try, eh?
#1. In this column, we begin to analyze one way in which the U.S. News rankings can negatively affect schools and the legal profession – by deterring schools from taking steps to diversify their student bodies – and possible responses to the problem.
Colleges have broken the law to allow unqualified minorities to attend their facilities. Are we really to believe that these race obsessed lunatics would ever knowingly keep magically delicious minorities from their campuses? I think not.
#2. Diversity is relevant because – as the Supreme Court has recognized and proclaimed in recent years – a diverse school provides a richer learning environment for its students
It does? That seems odd because…
The trend toward segregation was especially notable for African American students. Nationally, 70% of black charter students attend schools where at least 90% of students are minorities. That’s double the figure for traditional public schools. The typical black charter-school student attends a campus where nearly three in four students also are black, researchers with the Civil Rights Project at UCLA said Thursday.
But wait, there’s more…
Toronto trustees narrowly approve black school
TORONTO In a tight vote, Toronto District School Board trustees Tuesday night approved a contentious proposal for a black-focused school that opponents argued would be the equivalent of segregation.
The 11-9 vote in favour came after an evening of impassioned pleas both for and against the school from community members, including one from the mother of slain 15-year-old Jordan Manners.
Tuesday night’s vote means that an alternative Afrocentric school will open in the city in September, 2009, but its location and grade levels are still to be determined.
This is a bold decision, we’re opening ourselves up for real change in the system,†said trustee Michael Coteau, said after the vote. *snip*
It’s a bittersweet thing because it should have happened a long time ago and it shouldn’t have brought all this pain back to our black community. *snip*
Speakers in favour of the school said it’s misleading to equate it to segregation of black students. It’s not about segregation, it’s about self-determination, said Angela Wilson, who first proposed the idea to the school board.
Another speaker, Arlo Kempf, a father and former teacher, said that the board approving a black-focused school would be something courageous.
Seeing themselves [black students] in the curriculum, in their instructors is what’s needed, Mr. Kempf said.
The way you know something is pure 1A grade horseshit is when they want to have it both ways. So to our PC enforcers it is at once a wonderful expression of racial courage for Blacks to attend heavily Black schools while Whites are the spawn O’de debbil for not having more Blacks in schools Blacks aren’t statistically qualified to attend?
To borrow a phrase from Craig Bodecker: do you see the disconnect?
The end of this tripe actually made me laugh…
#3. who will then be better prepared, going forward, to enter and succeed in the realm of diversity that is the entire United States and the world.
Let me rewrite this so it makes sense to me…
#3.5 As the United States devolves into a third world hellhole it becomes critical for Whites to understand how to navigate the upcoming horrors of diversity including, corruption, violence, lowered standards et al.
Work for you?
How about also pleaing for white only schools? If the blacks can have them then we want some too!
Maybe the diversity index would not be a bad thing. Think of it: you could see how dark a school is, and make your choice from there. For the goody-goodies advocating this nonsense, the law of unintended consequences would come in, resulting in furthering the segregation they decry.
[...] coverage of “The New Segregation“ Segnala presso: Blacks in America, The New Segregation, [...]