Ahem…
Netanyahu: Egypt border fence will keep out terrorists, illegal migrants
“The situation is more grave, given the danger of terrorists and infiltrators, than I originally thought,”…
“We must reinforce the border and it will be possible to minimize the infiltration of terrorists, drug dealers, and illegal workers,”…
“This issue of infiltration has become a total industry… The borders of the state cannot be porous and this is a threat on a national level,”
And from a month ago…
This is a strategic decision to ensure the Jewish and democratic character of the state of Israel.
It is hard not to pointedly note the tasty hypocritical irony here.
*Obviously directed at slavering open border lunatic Jews, did I get that disclaimer up in time Friendly Grizz?
Straight up stolen from Vdare
I was struck by that exact language. The Jews tell us that it is absolutely critical for Israel to remain Jewish (as of course it is). They also tell us that America remaining White is absolutely “racist” and an expression of “hate.” (as of course is insane)
Perhaps I can get this squared away down at the local synagogue.
No, not from me, or none as I recall. I think you are referring to what are now being referred to as the “official Jews”. These are members of “official” Jewish organizations, and who profess to be our “leaders”. They fight the strawman issues because they are too chicken to take on the REAL issues.
Abe Foxman is a prime example.
No, I believe very highly in closed borders and support what Netenyahu is up to.
That first sentence I wrote was completely wrong… (wish you had an editor feature, or better yet, I was reading correctly this evening.(
Disclaimer is not needed, The. I know you well enough to know that you mean the Official Jew type, of which I wrote above, and about which Mark Steyn had a GREAT rant subbing on the Rush Limbaugh program today.
No worries mate, its just funner this way! And yeah, I was just yanking your chain a little bit, seemed like a good idea at the time!
The irony is pretty rich but to be fair, Israel shares borders with far more toxic and dangerous neighbors than we do. It would be a quick national suicide for them to open their borders to the teeming muslim hordes. It will take a while longer for our minorities to achieve a demographic takeover. In either case though, it is irreversible once it happens.
Mark J: Irony? No, not especially. The handwringing, bedwetting, sniveling hand-wringers known in the US as “Jews” are in very few if any ways related to the Israelis.
In Israel there are a lot of different factions doing battle with each other, but all recognize the need for unity when it comes to defending their land and lives. Their situation, like a death sentence about to be carried out, tends to focus the mind. As for all those different factions, there is a delightful old expression that defines the Jews well. Get two Jews together and you end up with three different opinions!
The biggest mistake the sniveling crowd makes is this: there really is no longer a need for the collectivist life led by Jewish people for so very long. I use the term collectivist in a neutral manner here. It is not political collectivism as much as a collectivism like a herd is a collective. It was, and in Israel’s case, a matter of defense. Jews were COMPELLED to live in ghettos. (more on the term ghetto in a moment). So the best was made of the situation. Certain professions were closed to Jews, so they made do with doing the jobs “good [insert dominant religion here] wouldn’t do”. Banding together helped form up a means of defense.
Although anti-Semitism in the western world is on the rise again, and has also become so fashionable among humanities and ” – studies” majors, Jews, at least here in the US, are completely free. There is no government-sanctioned round-ups, pogroms, or restrictions from certain professions as there was in Europe. Yet. Our Kenyan Muslim has not gone that far yet, and Patrick Buchanan has no real chance of being President. So the collectivism of the past is obsolete. And I hope like crazy it remains obsolete.
Now, about ghettos: when a black/negro/Africanamerican refers to his “ghetto”, ask to see his exit pass. The ones educated enough to know the meaning of the question will not use the term ghetto in the first place. Ask the Colt 45 / Newports black to see his pass. He will not have the foggiest idea what you mean. Ask him about the guard posts and the swing-down STOP sign operated by the guard. There are none, and he has no exit pass. Translation: he is using the word ghetto the same way as then cops gun down 2 black liquor store robbers they call it “genocide”. Both and more are great exaggerations pumped into their minds by their “leaders”.
Is Patrick Buchanan anti-semtic? I always thought he was a pretty smart guy. He is dead-on about the total waste of life and energy WWII was. It ended white domination of the world, killed tens of millions of whites (and white jews), and stained attempts to defend our race by association with the nazis. A classic, unnecessary, and horrible tragedy.
Sadly, I think he is, which is a damn shame because he is so good on so many other issues.
I’m uncertain if Pat Buchanan is a true anti-Semite, or if he’s just so committed to the non-interventionist cause (which I also support) that he seeks to deconstruct anything that is favored by neocons; such as WWII and Israel (which is a logical fallacy).
Being a recent convert to white nationalism, I’m fairly well exposed to anti-Semitism ranging from the intellectual Culture of Critique to the foaming at the mouth “No Jews, Just Right” VNN. Pat Buchanan’s words do not resemble anything from that universe. I’ve never seen him rant about Jewish roles in Third World mass immigration or the destruction of Western Civilization. It’s true that he could be hiding his views, but anti-Semites are so crazed that it’s almost impossible for them to keep their mouths shut on such views.
But I do agree that he takes his criticism of Israel too far, thus opening his flank to accusations of anti-Semitism. It would be far better for him to attack all US foreign aid, but recognize that Israel is a Western nation and is worth defending. Much like how Ilana Mercer, WND columnist and Barely a Blog paleolibertarian blogger, approaches Israel.
Although my biggest beef with Pat Buchanan is that he has so much influence and followers in contrast to Internet denizens like us, and he recognizes the dangers we face, and yet he hasn’t tried to channel energy into starting a real pro-white movement. He could easily become America’s Nick Griffin, and yet he seems more content just appearing on talk shows and arguing with crazy liberals and neocons. He’s practically a pet on MSNBC, and he probably makes a good amount of money representing America’s “far right” on the MSM. But what’s he waiting for? If he truly cares about white America, why doesn’t he just stop wasting his time talking about useless politicians who will never do anything to save our people?
John M, putting aside my view of the man, face it: Buchanan is getting old. He may just not have it in him to do these battles anymore.
Friendly Grizzly, you’re right, he is old. But he could at least jump start something, much like how Ron Paul, despite his age, gave new life to libertarianism.